Replies
No one has replied to this post.
Steve, I think 388 is still right because they've rolled the procured contracts over. If it was a new set, there would be a new code.
According to V2 of the Validation Rules, FM38 (and FM11) *shouldn't* trigger it, but that is a change from V1 which *didn't* have 38 and 11 in it, so maybe that's not worked it's way through to SLD yet???
V2 says: If the Learning Delivery Monitoring code for Procured Adult Education Budget 2023 (AEB) ' (LearningDeliveryFAM.LearnDelFAMType = LDM and LearningDeliveryFAM.LearnDelFAMCode = 388 ) is returned, then the aim must be a Funding model 35 or 10, the source of funding must be Adult funded and the programme type must not be returned where "11 or 38" is red, ie only added in V2 |
Steve Bowler
24/25 Rule Violation help
Created
Hi,
I'm hoping somebody can point out what I'm missing as at the moment all of our new aims for August are getting errors. They are aims that would've been AEB prior to 24/25 so are now ASF. If I use Funding Model 38 (Adult Skills Fund) and no LDM, we get the error UKPRN_29 - There is no Adult Skills Fund funding relationship for this UKPRN, the same error shows if I add LDM-388. If I use Funding Model 35 (Adult Skills) I get the error FundModel_17 - This funding model is not valid for the start date of the learning aim so I think I'm right to use FM38.
We have contracts signed for 24/25 and I can't see any other LDM codes I should be using but obviously I'm missing something! Any ideas?
Thanks
Steve