Replies
No one has replied to this post.
With all the faffing with the removal, then reinstatement of the "unemployed" bit in the Rules, it looks like we do need 391 in these because "unemployed" is now only a subset of "below earnings threshold"...
Haven't dug into the depths of the Validation Rule to check what it's doing but, for now, this seems to make these errors go away!
Charlie Dew
LDM 391
Created
Hi there,
I have ILR errors for learners who are unemployed, and in receipt of UC - they have FAM 388 and FM 38
Error - "The full funding indicator is not valid for this learning aim"
Do they also require LDM 391? I was under the impression 391 was for low earnings and unemployed and not in receipt of benefits.
Any help appreciated.
Charlie