Replies
No one has replied to this post.
Hi CME
If the learners are still in learning then they should stay on the ILR as continuing. I'm assuming that you are using the word 'extend' to reflect that they are continuing passed their planned end date, and you know that you cannot extend the planned end date in any way.
If the learner has completed all of their learning and moved into gateway then the coding should change so outcome = 8
When the learner sits EPA then the you can update the completion status to 2 which will trigger the completion payment, and outcome can be updated once confirmed by the EPAO.
There are no issues to be considered financially - that's how it all works. You would want to understand why the learner was due to complete learning in August but will not until the following year. What was the reason for slow progress, should there have been a break in learning? However, it does happen and for many standards EPA is increasingly taking place at longer intervals after the planned end of learning as end point assessment processes are lengthened.
CME
QAR Query (passed planned end date)
Created
Morning all,
we have an apprentice whose planned end date was 2nd August 2024.
They have still yet to sit EPA and we have been asked the question if they can extend until Sept 2025. They are currently active (continuing) in the ILR.
From a QAR point of view im assuming they will just remain as untimely and wont show as a withdrawal as there is only 1 POT for them on Maytas?
Also from a completion payment side of things, we have received all of the On programme funding so i correct in saying that if we do extend until Sept we wont get this completion payment until 25/26? Would that cause any issues financially?