Sarah Stephens-Lewis

Bootcamps v Apprenticeships

Created

None

Hi all, we have an apprentice learner that is doing a bootcamp in their spare time (i.e not in working hours). However, even though technically learners can do this, the Z prog codes are clashing in the system and causing an error.

Anyone know a work around for this please as the rules say yes but the system says no! Thanks in advance!

 

Replies

No one has replied to this post.


Steve Hewitt

Um, where do the rules say it's OK? Doesn't 27.6 preclude it?

27. 
A provider must not claim funding for individuals who:

27.6. Are in receipt of any other direct/indirect DfE funding during their 
apprenticeship; this includes any other DfE funded FE / HE programme, 
including those funded by the Office for Students or a student loan

Sarah Stephens-Lewis

Hi Steve, I may have got this completely wrong then and it is the first instance where we have had it so wish me luck!

In the funding rules, it also states that the issue is where it replicates learning, conflicts with learning aims or takes place during working hours (i.e contravenes with 20%).

If it does none of the above, isn't that ok?

Steve Hewitt

What's the Standard in and what's the Bootcamp? That's the only way I can answer the first two... Also, aren't employers meant to make a contribution for employed learners on a bootcamp?

I presume the Validation Rule you're knocking up against is the learner can't be on two programmes (ie ZPROGs) at once. It's a fairly consequential rule that stops a bunch of other silly things happening...

Sarah Stephens-Lewis

Hi there, original Electrical standard, Solar PV bootcamp. Employer has made a contribution, and you are completely correct about the ZProg! 

Steve Hewitt

OK, so I've got some good news and some bad news...

Good news is I agree with you that this is fundable, the bootcamp isn't going to replicate or conflict with the apprenticeship.

Bad news is you're going to have to make the case, via the customer help desk, that the Validation Rule (and actually, probably *several* validation rules) needs changing (and probably a new PDSAT report needs writing because if the validation goes away people might make mistakes)...

Probably want to get on this pretty quickly because I suspect it will take a while...

Sarah Stephens-Lewis

Thank you so much! i really appreciate your time and advice.

Katherine Lee

Hello - I potentially may have the same issue.  Did you get any resolution with your query? Does the ILR have a wobble with 2 ZPROGS? 

Sarah Stephens-Lewis

Hi there, in short, nope! It is still sat with DfE, the last thing they asked from us was a summary of everything we have tried and done and to request manual payment, which we have done, but not had an outcome as yet. Sorry I couldn't be of more help!

Katherine Lee

I've had an update from the help desk and it is a hard no that it's not possible and is against the funding rules and as Steve alludes to above - para 27.6 states it. :( 

Good luck and let me know if you have any progress. 

 

Sarah Stephens-Lewis

We have just had the same although really frustrating as this in in direct conflict to the Bootcamp regulations. It also goes against app funding regs as none of this learning is included in the standard. Yet another grey area in the funding rules then designed to make it difficult for Training Providers!

(Edited)

Steve Hewitt

I think, per Sarah's actually very good example, it *can* be fundable, it's *not* categorically against the rules, but the main problem we've got at the moment is the ILR isn't built to allow two concurrent programme aims.

Steve Hewitt

Oh, just seen Sarah's response :(((

They need to be EXPLICIT in the rules that learners Just Can't do an app and a bootcamp at the same time then (and there needs to be a better reason than "it will be hard to make the ILR work"...)

Katherine Lee

we had confirmation from our funder that it wasn't possible after initally saying it was.  I agree Steve, I think paperwork says yes and computer says no