Helene Barker

Rule Name: LearnDelFAMType_123

Edited

None

Hello all and Happy New Year to you.

I wonder if you could please help me with my query.  I have the following ILR error which I do not know how to resolve this and I am wondering if you could please help me.

Rule Name: LearnDelFAMType_123  and Error Message: The Full funding indicator is not valid for this learning aim

This learner is 19 year old and is unemployed and claiming benefits (UC) - but the postcode is outside the devolved area

I have applied the Full funding indicator as (FFI) as I believe that as unemployed and claiming benefit, that makes this learner eligible for full funding?  

I am not sure if I have missed anything here in terms of the guidance: please let me know if you are able to help.

Thanks in advance

Glad

 

Replies

No one has replied to this post.


Steve Hewitt

OK, this is probably straight forward? So, the precise definition is:

For starts on or after 1 August 2024 (LearningDelivery.LearnStartDate >= 2024-08-01) and where learning delivery category is not 37 and are Adult Skills Fund funded  (LearningDelivery.FundModel = 38), for learners aged between 19 -23 at the start of the aim ((LearningDelivery.LearnStartDate - Learner.DateOfBirth) >= 19 years and <=23 years), for aims that are level 2 or below (LARS_NotionalNVQLevelv2 = E, 1, or 2 where LearningDelivery.LearnAimRef = LARS_LearnAimRef), full funding cannot be claimed if the learner is not earning below the earnings threshold

The key thing here being the bold bit. Have you flagged them as LDM 391 *as well as* BSI 4? This was a change last year after all the faffing with the Unemployed definition vs Earnings Threshold which means we need the 391 in the records, not just the Benefit info.

Helene Barker

As Steve,

Thank you so much for getting back to me and thank you for pointing highlighting this: much appreciated your help.  This is very useful for me to resolve this error.

Thank you again for your help

Glad

Steve Hewitt

Just noticed as well that any devolved aims appear to be excluded from this rule, which is maybe why you've not had a lot of them?

Helene Barker

Thank you again Steve.  Yes you are correct for any devolved aims.