We use cookies to collect
information about how you use ‘Get help with DfE services’. We use this information to make the
website work as well as possible and improve government services.
You will be able to post, reply and subscribe once DfE approves your account for this community.
Steve Bowler
16-18 Traineeship - progression query
Created
None
Morning,
We have an EFA funded 16-18 Traineeship learner who enrolled on 12.11.20 and last attendance was 23.11.20, they completed 12 hours so I have updated the learning hours field to this instead of the amount planned for the whole Traineeship. They progressed into employment so I have coded the programme aim as achieved and added the Destination & Progression record to show employment.
Upon uploading the ILR file, the 'Funding by Student' report shows them as not qualifying for funding and £0, I don't expect much funding obviously but I thought they should show as funded/retained seeing as they progressed? Am I missing something on the ILR?
Thanks
Steve
0
Replies
No one has replied to this post.
Steve Hewitt
My suspicion is it's because Study Progs have to be at least a fortnight to be fundable? Para 93, 20/21 V1.1 Guidance.
I thought that might be it but had a feeling that if a learner achieved the Traineeship (successful progression) that the 14 day duration didn't need to be met?
Steve Bowler
16-18 Traineeship - progression query
Created
Morning,
We have an EFA funded 16-18 Traineeship learner who enrolled on 12.11.20 and last attendance was 23.11.20, they completed 12 hours so I have updated the learning hours field to this instead of the amount planned for the whole Traineeship. They progressed into employment so I have coded the programme aim as achieved and added the Destination & Progression record to show employment.
Upon uploading the ILR file, the 'Funding by Student' report shows them as not qualifying for funding and £0, I don't expect much funding obviously but I thought they should show as funded/retained seeing as they progressed? Am I missing something on the ILR?
Thanks
Steve