Replies
No one has replied to this post.
I'm not familiar with the different FMR's but a learner with a prior attainment at L2+ would not be fully funded, unless they were in receipt of benefits. if they are employed/not in receipt of benefits then they would be co-funded.
I'm not sure why it states you must change it to 99 as that implies its full-cost
Angela Williams
FRM16 - Learners who have achieved a full L2
Created
Hi
Can someone please clarify the guidance regarding the FRM16 report – Learners who have achieved a full L2 qualification (or higher) and are fully funded for a further L2 entitlement.
I have 18 learners suddenly appear on this report from the R09 data submitted but I am unsure as to why this is the case, could someone clarify for me?
All the learners are aged between 30 to 50, unemployed and on benefits.
Learning aims 50090513 – Diploma Hairdressing
50090768 – Diploma Beauty Therapy
The guidance for FRM16 shows that the provider has to take the action below -
Correct data, learner is ineligible
You must recode the aims with Funding model code 99, or follow provider support manual guidance on correcting data errors after hard close of the previous year (aims with an incorrect funding model).
It’s a lot of funding to lose!
Many thanks
Angie Williams