Replies
No one has replied to this post.
Steve Hewitt Do you mean they have been absent from your ILR file all year, but should have been present? And R11 is the first month that the discrepancy has been reported?
That would be the exact opposite of our situation. The aim has been in the ILR all year and has not appeared on the FRM report until R11. Now that R11 FRM is reporting the problem, there doesn't seem to be a problem (well not one that I can see).
peter.hancock
FRM06 in R11 2026
Created
Our FRM report for R11 showed a problem for one learner on the FRM06 rule. This means that a continuing aim from last year is not present in this year's ILR. We have not seen this issue reported earlier this year.
I've checked our ILRs for R10 and R11 and the relevant learning aim is still showed correctly in both. So, it looks like a reporting error to me.
Has anybody else had spurious FRM06 errors recently?