peter.hancock

FRM06 in R11 2026

Created

None

Our FRM report for R11 showed a problem for one learner on the FRM06 rule.  This means that a continuing aim from last year is not present in this year's ILR.  We have not seen this issue reported earlier this year.  

I've checked our ILRs for R10 and R11 and the relevant learning aim is still showed correctly in both.  So, it looks like a reporting error to me.  

Has anybody else had spurious FRM06 errors recently?  

Replies

No one has replied to this post.


Steve Hewitt

All of mine (and there have been slightly more than I'd have liked!) have been correct. Not something different in the start or end date in R11 is there? Will show if there's even a day's difference I think? Also, thanks for the reminder to tidy mine up!!!

Steve Hewitt

Of course, on saying that and going to tidy mine, there's a learner popped up who hasn't been in the file all year but should have been but this is definitely the first time they've appeared on the FRM...

peter.hancock

Steve Hewitt Do you mean they have been absent from your ILR file all year, but should have been present?  And R11 is the first month that the discrepancy has been reported?  

That would be the exact opposite of our situation.  The aim has been in the ILR all year and has not appeared on the FRM report until R11.  Now that R11 FRM is reporting the problem, there doesn't seem to be a problem (well not one that I can see).

Steve Hewitt

OK, triple checked and hasn't been in the file since R04 BUT hasn't been on FRMs subsequently until now.

peter.hancock

That's strange isn't it?  That suggests the FRM report wasn't looking at the latest ILR data until R11.  

 

Steve Hewitt

Who knows, it's definitely been picking up other learners month on month (we've been moving to new systems (yes, plural) this academic year so there has been Quite A Lot Of Fun making sure everyone is where they should be!)