Replies
No one has replied to this post.
I've been looking at this issue with the 23-24 QAR data against the AAF dashboard - the dashboard has included the old aims in its 'leavers', so that the QAR is showing as 24% (11 achievers /38 leavers) rather than 45% (11/24), which suggests that the treatment of transfers has changed.
AAF does not equal QAR!!!
There was no change to the published methodology and, as these are ONS-endorsed stats, they cannot, to use a technical term, p!ss about with them.
Did you double definitely have withdrawal reason as 40? If you have, and there's definitely less than 120 days between aims, then AAF is just wrong...
Colette Cook
QAR and Transfers
Created
Hi all - just looking at a transfer to a new learning aim with the same provider
Provider Support Manual states that we would record as a withdrawn aim, non achieved. When I have checked the QAR business rules (extract below) it says that this would not affect our QAR - has anyone had any experience of this? Thanks in advance
The learning aims we exclude from QARs
Transfers: i. Where a learner transferred to a different programme or learning aim within the same provider and we can match to a new aim where the start date of the new aim is within 120 days of the actual end date of the old aim ii. Where a learner transferred to a new provider following our inter