Replies
No one has replied to this post.
Hi Jon
This is getting increasingly complicated!
For NATIONAL, non-devolved AEB, Asylum Seekers are not considered Unemployed because they're not allowed to work (this was precisely the wording used to me in a reply from ESFA). Because they're not allowed to work, they also cannot be low-waged. There is no "get out" clause for these learners to be fully funded, although, of course, they can be co-funded if they've been here six months.
Currently, GMCA, CPCA and GLA are fully funding Asylum Seekers (GMCA on ESOL only I think, the other two on everything) through variations to their funding rules. Not aware of any of the other devolved authorities doing anything yet, although more than keen to join in with any lobbying anyone hears about!
Suspect you've already thought of this, but it is allowable to use a small amount of your LearnER Support Fund to cover fees for people who meet whatever criteria the organisation sets (and, given how few learners *aren't* fully funded these days, there aren't many options!).
Also, quick plug for Ruth Hayman Trust, a charity I am very proud to be Chair of, which supports learners whose first language isn't English (a lot of whom are seeking sanctuary in one way or another) with course fees: http://www.ruthhaymantrust.org.uk/
Jon White
ESOL Funding for Asylum Seekers - Full or Co-Funding?
Created
Hi,
A question was asked here a year ago about Asylum Seekers receiving Aspen-only benefits. I'm asking if anyone has since found a way to claim full funding for Aslum Seekers on Adult Skills (model 35) ESOL aims. My large group of Asylum Seekers are receiving Aspen and not yet receiving any of the listed qualifying benefits for full funding. I also wondered about using LDM363 (low-wages). What do others think?
Many thanks, Jon