PDSAT 22A-404

Hi Neil,

What are you reporting as your learners prior attainment?

The DSAT Report 22A-404 - Learners on Level 2 learning Aims that are not part of the legal entitlement for the most part will only return records where both the learner's prior attainment is reported as below L2 (inc Unknown) and the qual they are on is not identified as having Category 37 in the latest LARS (Now find a learning aim) download.

Also note that age is calculated from the start date of the AIM.

For completeness here is the spec for inclusion of aims on 22A-404:

22A-404 Identifies all learning aims WHERE:

FundModel = 35, Age at aim start between 19 and 23,

PriorLevel is In (1, 2, 3, 97, 98, 99),

ProgType is Not In (2, 3, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24),

(LearnActEndDate >= 01/08/2021 OR LearnActEndDate Is Null),

RES <> 1,

NotionalNVQLevelv2 = 2, (CategoryRef = 40 and CategoryRef Not In (20, 22, 37, 39),

BasicSkillsType Not In (22, 26, 27, 28, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42) AND there are no learning aims in the ILR for the same learner WHERE Outcome = 1,
(

      (CategoryRef = 37, SuccessRateMapCode <> "BL000001" AND FullLevel2Percent = 100)
       OR
      (CategoryRef = 38, FullLevel3Percent = 100 AND LearnAimRefTitle Not Like '%GCE A%')
      OR NotionalNVQLevelv2 > 3
) AND LearnActEndDate < the earliest start date of the aim identified above.

HTH

Phil

Yeah, I'm wondering if your devolved authority is being a bit overzealous here? The whole point of adding the date bound Prior Attainment was to catch these learners (19-23s without FL2 on non FL2 aims)? Mainly so a learner could do an FL2 Sept-Easter than another L2 aim in the summer term with fewer problems...

Thanks both of you for your replies.

This learner in enrolled on learning aim 50063297, has a prior attainment of L1 (ILR Code=2) and is 21 years old, this is the only enrolment so the prior attainment date is the same date.

Am I missing something?

Thanks again!

Weird, that should definitely have popped up on the PDSAT...