Heather Ankers

Returning a Bil

Created

I am after some help when returning a learner from a Bil.

Original aims were all closed down and new ones added with the 'tick' in the this is a re-start button.

My concern is the values in the TNP1 and TNP2.

This learner had completed 10 out of his 12 months prior to the break, upon return we entered the original TNP 1 and TNP 2 values but it was showing it wanted to pay 50% of the total funding which isn't right.

What values should I be entering in here?

Any help/advice appreciated.

Replies

No one has replied to this post.


Steve Hewitt

Hi Heather, confused by what "it" is?

Have you put the Original Start Date in the new records? That's the thing that links the two bits of learning together. We definitely use the original TNP1 and 2 in returning BIL records though.

Heather Ankers

Thanks Steveh,

'It' was the funding report when running through FIS.

And yes to the original dates, we also included the re-start date.

 

Martin West

That may be correct, see the following from the funding guide:

  1. When the apprentice resumes learning, we expect you to enter a price against the new programme aim in the ILR. This price may be the same as you previously recorded for the programme but can be a revised price depending on the amount of learning now required. After applying the funding band maximum, we will subtract 20% of this price for completion and, if the price is not a residual price, we will subtract any earnings to date. We will spread the remainder equally over the remaining planned duration.

Steve Hewitt

Aha, I was wondering if it was the indicative report from FIS.

Yes, it will do that, because it's DUMB and doesn't know how much you've had previously, so just splits the TNPs it can see over the duration it can see. Don't worry, the learner won't actually generate that much.

Heather Ankers

Brilliant, thanks both, that has put me at ease.  

Appreciate your input.

Thanks

Heather

Steve Hewitt

(you would not believe how long it took me to realise the Indicative report was doing that and that that was the main reason I couldn't get indicative and the monthly payment report to match, so anyone else I can save that torture, I'm glad to do so!!!)

Martin West

Steveh, reporting is a bit of a mess.

The funding calculation for returning from a BIL is correct in the indicative report from FIS but the indicative report from SLD has an issue where it incorrectly includes any balancing payment and outcome payment when the completion status is 1 and outcome 8 but it is correct in the payments report.

HTH

Steve Hewitt

Ah, FIS only gets it right if the "first half" of the BIL is in the ILR as well, which not everyone/every system does when the gap spans funding years...  If it's not there then what Heather mentions happens.