Sharon Lillywhite
Last activity
Member since
Votes
7
Subscriptions
18
Replies
Sharon Lillywhite commented,
Absolutely, thank you for the reassurance that we were doing our roles right. Have a lovely day
Absolutely, thank you for the reassurance that we were doing our roles right. Have a lovely day
Sharon Lillywhite commented,
ok got it, thank you , i didnt like the idea of adding in data to match the OTJ as i can evidence my reasons if i am audited but this report is increasing each month i enrol so looks awful when i present it to SLT as supposedly wrong data my team are entering. thanks Steve, Ill email thepDSAT helpdesk now and carry on doing it the way i have always been doing it
ok got it, thank you , i didnt like the idea of adding in data to match the OTJ as i can evidence my reasons if i am audited but this report is increasing each month i enrol so looks awful when i p...
Sharon Lillywhite commented,
HI Steve thank you , so if we have a learner whos on a 40 hr contract, we should use the employer identify as 21-30 hrs as this is the min now required , this will then reflect against the 372 we have made our plan so the reports will match? This is incorrect fields being picked as we know they are declaring 40 hours but to satisfy the 30 hours we should do 21-30 hours and really only use this check for those on under 30 hours to identify those needing the extension to the plan. Currently my ILR states OTJ - 372 - contracted hours field - always showing what the learner has declared and the employer intensity showing correct choice based on the actual contracted hours.
HI Steve thank you , so if we have a learner whos on a 40 hr contract, we should use the employer identify as 21-30 hrs as this is the min now required , this will then reflect against the 372 we h...
Sharon Lillywhite commented,
HI, ive just put my file in and got 61 traineeship learners onour AEB contract all stating invalid postcode, this was not there last month. Do you know how to override this as we have checked and there is a postcode in there, its the same as the delivery postcode from quick glances at it
HI, ive just put my file in and got 61 traineeship learners onour AEB contract all stating invalid postcode, this was not there last month. Do you know how to override this as we have checked and...
Sharon Lillywhite commented,
HI All I have apprentices who have completed apprenticeships, i have closed off the standard with end date and achievement date (being different dates obviously) and the achievements are not being paid out, the DAS remains live instead of completed and the employers accounts are showing as live and not ending their end and they are advised not to stop the accounts if the outcome is achieved. Can anyone help with this, in the destination and progression do you need to put an end date in the outcome field as well as the start date of the outcome ?
HI All I have apprentices who have completed apprenticeships, i have closed off the standard with end date and achievement date (being different dates obviously) and the achievements are not being ...