Matthew Wallace
Last activity
Member since
Votes
0
Subscriptions
2
Replies
Matthew Wallace commented,
Hi Martin, thanks for your quick reply. So for example in this case the learner only completed 300 hours between their start date and planned end date, meaning the min 20% wasn't met. The hours were caught up after the planned end date so this would be ok? By definition is the planned duration the period between the apprenticeship start date and the planned end date? Thanks for your help.
Hi Martin, thanks for your quick reply. So for example in this case the learner only completed 300 hours between their start date and planned end date, meaning the min 20% wasn't met. The hours wer...
Matthew Wallace commented,
Hi, Can anyone please advise on the below scenario? Learner had an agreed number of OTJT hours of 500 during the planned duration of their apprenticeship. College training was delayed due to Covid, which meant the learner went over their planned end date. Learner has 538 hours recorded on their OTJ log which means they have met the planned hours, but achieved a year after their planned end date. Would a summary statement be required in this instance? In addition to this, due to the College training being delayed the apprentice did not hit the minimum of 20% OTJ hours during their planned duration, will this be an issue? Note the learner was not placed on a break in learning. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Hi, Can anyone please advise on the below scenario? Learner had an agreed number of OTJT hours of 500 during the planned duration of their apprenticeship. College training was delayed due to Covid,...