Richard Heath
Last activity
Member since
Votes
8
Subscriptions
19
Replies
Richard Heath commented,
Thanks Steve Hewitt. By the way, you did say it on a different thread! [image]
Thanks Steve Hewitt. By the way, you did say it on a different thread!
Richard Heath commented,
Hi Peter Hancock. Unfortunately I didn't get any further. I suppose there is a different way of looking at it: if we are seeking an assessment because a learner has additional needs due to a specific learning disability (dyslexia), we will be making adjustments for them that incur costs, so a Learning Support claim would be appropriate; if we choose to use that funding to pay for a formal dyslexia assessment, that is up to us. In that scenario, perhaps the question is moot unless we get into the level of spend that would require an Earnings Adjustment Statement submission?
Hi Peter Hancock. Unfortunately I didn't get any further. I suppose there is a different way of looking at it: if we are seeking an assessment because a learner has additional needs due to a specif...
Richard Heath commented,
Ruth Canham-James indeed. Give it ten years and someone might decide it makes sense to have a single set of rules...
Ruth Canham-James indeed. Give it ten years and someone might decide it makes sense to have a single set of rules...
Richard Heath commented,
Thanks Steve - I thought that was the case but wanted to check. We did ask the question at the time of devolution and got a firm no - it might be worth asking again I suppose, though the additional administrative requirements would not be welcome. On a broader question: as in a few years we will be in a situation where everywhere is devolved, what thinking has there been about how 'cross-border' work is enabled? I haven't seen any discussion of this, but it will be a major issue. My own area (Warwickshire) is bordered by not just the WMCA but also six other counties: if they, like Warwickshire, were to end up with single-authority devolution deals, it would be ridiculous for us either to hold 8 different funding contracts or to have to turn learners away at the county border. But without some kind of nationally coordinated approach, I don't see another alternative.
Thanks Steve - I thought that was the case but wanted to check. We did ask the question at the time of devolution and got a firm no - it might be worth asking again I suppose, though the additional...
Richard Heath commented,
Thanks Steve. Yes, if I were a procured contract holder I think I would have something to say. As it is, I won't peer any further into the gifthorse's mouth.
Thanks Steve. Yes, if I were a procured contract holder I think I would have something to say. As it is, I won't peer any further into the gifthorse's mouth.
Richard Heath commented,
We have grave concerns about the need to view bank statements, for the same reasons that have already been posted here: it is both highly intrusive, and not remotely reliable. And frankly a July date for clarifying the unemployed definition is completely unhelpful. Why the delay? Does anyone know if these concerns are being fed back to DfE?
We have grave concerns about the need to view bank statements, for the same reasons that have already been posted here: it is both highly intrusive, and not remotely reliable. And frankly a July da...
Richard Heath commented,
Thanks Martin. I wasn't sure as there are still some Level 2 qualifications funded for new starts this year under 6.2 and even some units by the looks of it (e.g. F5051744; L6159844; D6161243).
Thanks Martin. I wasn't sure as there are still some Level 2 qualifications funded for new starts this year under 6.2 and even some units by the looks of it (e.g. F5051744; L6159844; D6161243).
Richard Heath commented,
Thanks Steve. That has always been my own understanding.
Thanks Steve. That has always been my own understanding.
Richard Heath commented,
Thanks Steve. We are at a 'maximally efficient' 70 hours so yes, any reduction will take us over the cliff. The hit we would be taking would be a double whammy, as there is the cost of accreditation as well as the reduction in funding.
Thanks Steve. We are at a 'maximally efficient' 70 hours so yes, any reduction will take us over the cliff. The hit we would be taking would be a double whammy, as there is the cost of accreditatio...
Richard Heath commented,
Jess Reading did you ever get a reply from the ESFA on this?
Jess Reading did you ever get a reply from the ESFA on this?