Replies
No one has replied to this post.
The chief purpose of the reviews is to check that the reasonable adjustments are effective and still necessary. Where the support is ongoing, it makes sense for these reviews to occur every 3 months, but if you've only facilitated one instance of support and the learner's assessment clearly states that's all that will be needed, it wouldn't make sense to then conduct 3-monthly reviews when you know there's nothing to look at.
Obviously as part of your standard progress reviews there should be a discussion around whether additional support is required. If so, you'd revisit their learning support plan and revise it accordingly, which may then necessitate regular 3-monthly support reviews.
Sarah Rix
LSF reviews
Created
I am hoping someone will be able to share some advice regarding LSF claims and review evidence.
Where a claim is made for LSF or EAS/LSF for a particular apprentice, do you complete 3 month reviews even if claims aren’t necessary for every successive month. Or alternatively, if there is a break between claims of more than 3 months, or a situation where there is an initial outlay but no further attributable costs while study continues (even though reasonable adjustments might be remaining in place), would 3 month reviews continue.
Many thanks Sarah