Wayne Hosking

Functional Skills - retake

Created

None

We have a learner who studied functional skills Level 1 under adult skills over 12 months ago with no achievement. They have now studied it again under an apprenticeship. I'm assuming the money cannot be claimed twice for the same learning even though they never passed?

thoughts?

regards

Wayne

Replies

No one has replied to this post.


Steven Edmondson

You need to do a proper assessment for recognition of prior learning and adjust accordingly. If you initial assessment shows the learner is still working only entry level you should be able to justify L1 delivery in full? I'd be wary of doing a full claim so close to another period of study though.

Wayne Hosking

Initial assessment results came out as working towards Level 1 (1.5) thus 50% of the way towards the Level 1. Maybe on that basis, you could assume you claim 50% funding left?

(Edited)

Steve Hewitt

So, App funding for E&M IS NOT subject to RPL for prior study, you totally get the whole £724 regardless.

(actually, if this was Adult Skills, you can ALSO totally have the whole amount again because they FAILED, as long as they come to the classes)

The only time you reduce E&M on Apps is when they come back from a BIL to the same qual that you've already delivered some of.

Steven Edmondson

That sounds absolutely reasonable to me.

Wayne Hosking

Many thanks for the advice.

Steven Edmondson

Wow, I'm not actually in the apprenticeships department so this was a misunderstanding on my part sorry, I'd always thought auditors would take issue with this. What about if a learner changes to a different specification for a broadly similar qualification? For example to change from Edexcel to AQA functional skills Maths L2?

Steve Hewitt

Sorry Steve, do you mean the same apprentice on the same app changing boards? Would be strongly tempted just to overwrite the learning aim so it reflects the Awarding Org they're actually taking the test with, leave the start and end the same and forget the other board existed? Then you're definitely generating the right money and you can show they were on FS from the right dates.

Steven Edmondson

Hi Steve, yes, sounds good if in year but what if they started in a previous AY that we now can't leave hanging?

Richard Phipps

In that case I would reduce down the funding on the new FS to take into account the amount you previously earned under the old Awarding Org.