Desiree Rooker
Last activity
Member since
Votes
1
Subscriptions
15
Replies
Desiree Rooker commented,
Hi Becky Thank you for the response. This is very helpful. Is that filed the same as the Franchising Partner field in the ILR tab in the learning aim?
Hi Becky Thank you for the response. This is very helpful. Is that filed the same as the Franchising Partner field in the ILR tab in the learning aim?
Desiree Rooker commented,
Thank you for the reply, Steve, good to double check this
Thank you for the reply, Steve, good to double check this
Desiree Rooker commented,
Hi Ruth. Yes, that is correct, Z00 aim component. I have also coded that as 2/8 with the actual end date. It was just odd that it was not taking the info the same across bot aims. I also read to not use a code 2 and 8 in the ZPROG but to wait for the results and then code 2 and 1 for achieved and 2 and 3 for fail once we have the results in September 2025 and then update the component aim the same.
Hi Ruth. Yes, that is correct, Z00 aim component. I have also coded that as 2/8 with the actual end date. It was just odd that it was not taking the info the same across bot aims. I also read to no...
Desiree Rooker commented,
That sounds correct in the same way I have it and seems to be the only way it didn't create a rule violation error. Thank you for confirming.
That sounds correct in the same way I have it and seems to be the only way it didn't create a rule violation error. Thank you for confirming.
Desiree Rooker commented,
If you record a completion status 1 and outcome 8 with the actual end date in the ZPROG- programme aim, what do you record in the component learning aim, I seem to get rule violation errors processing the ZPROG and learning aim the same?
If you record a completion status 1 and outcome 8 with the actual end date in the ZPROG- programme aim, what do you record in the component learning aim, I seem to get rule violation errors process...
Desiree Rooker commented,
Hi Ruth thank you for responding. After being withdrawn we did a restart with residual costs £13 346 and TNP3 and TNP4 recorded in the ILR, not the original pricing, 5% Co Investment on that £667.3 was invoiced to the employer and recorded in the ILR, which I thought would be correct, but something is withholding the completion payment. I have raised a ticket but has been waiting over two months now for tech support, so I'm exploring suggestions. Thank you.
Hi Ruth thank you for responding. After being withdrawn we did a restart with residual costs £13 346 and TNP3 and TNP4 recorded in the ILR, not the original pricing, 5% Co Investment on that £667.3...
Desiree Rooker commented,
Following on from this thread. Missing completion payment: I have a learner who we collected co-investment for with a levy employer, recorded in Pro Solutions in the ILR, the student then withdrew. She then returned to the same apprenticeship as a restart, but now with a non-levy employer. Co-Investment for the remainder programme was paid by the new employer and recorded in the ILR. But now after completing the apprenticeship we have not received the completion payment. On the co-investment report it is not pulling through the co-investments before the withdrawal. Is it then the process to record those co-investments again, it doesn't seem correct against the new employer? Any ideas? Thank you
Following on from this thread. Missing completion payment: I have a learner who we collected co-investment for with a levy employer, recorded in Pro Solutions in the ILR, the student then withdrew...
Desiree Rooker commented,
Thanks for the reply, Ruth The ESFA recommended this: When adding new TNP3 and TNP4 prices at a later date - you must remember this is a residual cost from the new date that the costs are being added. Where leaners changed employers in the previous funding year, to then record a change in TNP3 and TNP 4 to reflect an increase in EPA assessment costs - you would need to add a new TNP3 and TNP4 residual cost dated in the current funding year. You will then need to use the Data mismatch process to update the agreed cost on the Apprenticeship Service record. I understand matching the data lock. My question with this is if you add a new date against the TNP3 and TNP 4, in the ILR, at the point when the EPA price changed, other than trying to match the changes in pricing will it not look in the AS employer account for a date that matches that change as well in the AS account against the employer. How would you get around that?
Thanks for the reply, Ruth The ESFA recommended this: When adding new TNP3 and TNP4 prices at a later date - you must remember this is a residual cost from the new date that the costs are being add...
Desiree Rooker commented,