MR commented, 17 August 2022 10:15

Hi Steve Yes they are P1 222/23 enrollments......    :(

1. Error

Hi Steve Yes they are P1 222/23 enrollments......    :(

MR commented, 19 July 2022 19:29

Hello Martin, sorry I mean the allocation timeframes such as the below. Sorry I automatically use this terminology, thanks for your help as always  Aug 21 - Mar 22 Apr 22 - Jul 22

1. AEB 10%

Hello Martin, sorry I mean the allocation timeframes such as the below. Sorry I automatically use this terminology, thanks for your help as always  Aug 21 - Mar 22 Apr 22 - Jul 22

MR commented, 19 July 2022 14:34

Thanks Martin, do you know if the 10% is based on envelopes or overall values?

1. AEB 10%

Thanks Martin, do you know if the 10% is based on envelopes or overall values?

MR commented, 23 June 2022 15:43

Thanks Martin, so my achievement rate would be 0% for something that is beyond my control?

1. Achievement Rates

Thanks Martin, so my achievement rate would be 0% for something that is beyond my control?

MR commented, 22 June 2022 07:57

Thanks Martin, So for example, if I have a co hort of learners on an Apprenticeship standard with an expected end date of 10/07/2022 and they complete on this date ready for EPA, EPA takes place on 11/09/2022, my achievement rate will be 0% due to EPAO timeframes?

1. Achievement Rates

Thanks Martin, So for example, if I have a co hort of learners on an Apprenticeship standard with an expected end date of 10/07/2022 and they complete on this date ready for EPA, EPA takes place on...

MR commented, 14 June 2022 12:03

Hi Steve, that makes perfect sense thanks  

1. Accountability Framework

Hi Steve, that makes perfect sense thanks  

MR commented, 14 June 2022 07:57

Thanks Paul, that's how I worked it out although, I initially thought it would be based on the contract year that is affected (contract year the learner is due to achieve) to align with the achievement rates. I was maybe over thinking it as this way kind of makes sense. So, the percentage could decrease as additional starts are processed via the ILR? 

1. Accountability Framework

Thanks Paul, that's how I worked it out although, I initially thought it would be based on the contract year that is affected (contract year the learner is due to achieve) to align with the achieve...

MR commented, 31 March 2022 12:17

Thank you :) 

1. Welsh Workplace

Thank you :) 

MR commented, 10 March 2022 09:57

That is great thank you for your help

1. Traineeship progression

That is great thank you for your help

MR commented, 19 January 2022 11:27

Thanks Martin, the learner is a withdrawel with an actual last point of learning prior to the expected end funding date. I have checked all dates via the ILR and can not see any discrepancies, this is flagging as an error on the ILR

1. The Date applies to must not be after the Learning actual end date

Thanks Martin, the learner is a withdrawel with an actual last point of learning prior to the expected end funding date. I have checked all dates via the ILR and can not see any discrepancies, this...