Clair Ayling
Last activity
Member since
Votes
8
Subscriptions
42
Replies
Clair Ayling commented,
Great! Thanks for the reassurance Steve, always helps :-)
Great! Thanks for the reassurance Steve, always helps :-)
Clair Ayling commented,
Thanks, Steve. They are definitely not on the contributions report and no employer co-investment show as owing on the MPR either. Thinking of the logic though, the report (like the IER) looks to be using SEM for the first day of learning so it potentially including the one who was originally with a levy payer for that reason. The other one was on a BIL when they were made redundant so they returned to learning also without an SEM appearing.
Thanks, Steve. They are definitely not on the contributions report and no employer co-investment show as owing on the MPR either. Thinking of the logic though, the report (like the IER) looks to ...
Clair Ayling commented,
Does this have implications for the collection of co-investment if on-programme payments are received whilst the learner is between employment?
Does this have implications for the collection of co-investment if on-programme payments are received whilst the learner is between employment?
Clair Ayling commented,
Has anyone been able to challenge this successfully given that it is affecting quite a number of providers/employers?
Has anyone been able to challenge this successfully given that it is affecting quite a number of providers/employers?
Clair Ayling commented,
LearnDelFAMType_81 The Full funding indicator is not valid for this learning aim The Employment Status is 11 and Benefit status in receipt of state benefit other than JSA, Universal Credit or ESA (WRAG) I have checked that the aim is funded. Many thanks!
LearnDelFAMType_81 The Full funding indicator is not valid for this learning aim The Employment Status is 11 and Benefit status in receipt of state benefit other than JSA, Universal Credit or ESA ...
Clair Ayling commented,
Thanks both, Yes, sadly was on current PSM which made me question myself! ACT 1 is is :-)
Thanks both, Yes, sadly was on current PSM which made me question myself! ACT 1 is is :-)
Clair Ayling commented,
Apprenticeships for non-levy employers on the apprenticeship service will be funded through a contract for services with the employer (ACT 1 in the ILR), and not a contract for services with us (ACT 2 in the ILR). Found this! Am not going mad after all!
Apprenticeships for non-levy employers on the apprenticeship service will be funded through a contract for services with the employer (ACT 1 in the ILR), and not a contract for services with us (AC...