David Lacey
Last activity
Member since
Votes
5
Subscriptions
3
Replies
David Lacey commented,
Thinking ahead to the 22/23 submission, how should persons who have left employment in the submission year and then been re-employed later in the same year be treated for the calculation of FTE and Annual Salary etc. Should both employments be factored into the figures or just the latest employment
Thinking ahead to the 22/23 submission, how should persons who have left employment in the submission year and then been re-employed later in the same year be treated for the calculation of FTE and...
David Lacey commented,
[image] Hi Peter, I think the entity as highlighted is missing an "i" , in Entity, though as you say the XMLEntityName is consistent with then schema
Hi Peter, I think the entity as highlighted is missing an "i" , in Entity, though as you say the XMLEntityName is consistent with then schema
David Lacey commented,
Hi Peter ParticpatedInDfEProgrammes is missing an "i" betwen "c" and "p"
Hi Peter ParticpatedInDfEProgrammes is missing an "i" betwen "c" and "p"
David Lacey commented,
Hi Peter "specification and the entity name (ParticpatedInDfEProgrammes)" Missing an i. between c and p
Hi Peter "specification and the entity name (ParticpatedInDfEProgrammes)" Missing an i. between c and p
David Lacey commented,
Just noticed a small inconsistency in the record spec against the schema. Looks like a typo. Presumably, the schema is correct [image]
Just noticed a small inconsistency in the record spec against the schema. Looks like a typo. Presumably, the schema is correct
David Lacey commented,
Thanks Steven. That's really appreciated. I think the penny was beginning to drop with me So it only applies to those with a Teaching Role? [image]
Thanks Steven. That's really appreciated. I think the penny was beginning to drop with me So it only applies to those with a Teaching Role?
David Lacey commented,
I should add we are generating the xml output from our own payroll software
I should add we are generating the xml output from our own payroll software
David Lacey commented,
Looking at Peter's reply Victoria Connors-Lord You should include all staff members that support ESFA funded learners whether they teach or not. If you have a small number of staff you may find it easier to use the online form rather than the desktop application to complete your staff collection. Note if using the desktop application all the columns left to right from Main Subject Taught to Current Industry Experience must only be populated for teaching staff. If you populate any of these teaching staff columns for a member of staff without a teaching sub role selected then you will generate errors on the row. How does this tie in with the record specification for the xml output. Main Subject Taught is specified as mandatory [image]
Looking at Peter's reply Victoria Connors-Lord You should include all staff members that support ESFA funded learners whether they teach or not. If you have a small number of staff you may find it...
David Lacey commented,
[image] I see there has been an update on 12th September 2022
I see there has been an update on 12th September 2022
David Lacey commented,
Thanks Jon. We have built the production of the xml into our commercial Payroll and HR Software. The biggest pain point for our customers has been the collating of the teaching data, so as well as adding screens to the software, we provided import spreadsheets to assist. However, the task of pulling all the data together is proving quite onerous and time consuming, so, as you say, for those waiting on the ESFA app, the sooner it is published the better.
Thanks Jon. We have built the production of the xml into our commercial Payroll and HR Software. The biggest pain point for our customers has been the collating of the teaching data, so as well as ...