Charmaine Keeley
Last activity
Member since
Votes
0
Subscriptions
19
Replies
Charmaine Keeley commented,
Ben James - thank you for your super helpful response. I'm starting to slowly see how it all fits together - had missed the magic .5 for the 1/8 learners - that explains it. Thanks again!
Ben James - thank you for your super helpful response. I'm starting to slowly see how it all fits together - had missed the magic .5 for the 1/8 learners - that explains it. Thanks again!
Charmaine Keeley commented,
Michelle Leonard honestly, I can't remember what we did with the DAS. I'd probably try without DAS changes first and check the data match report. If it doesn't get flagged on there you should be ok.
Michelle Leonard honestly, I can't remember what we did with the DAS. I'd probably try without DAS changes first and check the data match report. If it doesn't get flagged on there you should be ok.
Charmaine Keeley commented,
Hi Michelle Leonard, based on advice from the helpdesk, we put TNP3 as £0 (learner was PPED and we'd received all on programme payments), and TNP4 as the value of funding left to be paid to us, not the full EPA cost, as due to prior change of employer and the 80/20 rule we'd already received some of that! We received the full balance of funding (i.e. the TNP4 figure) when the learner completed. So in your case, I'd be going with TNP3 as £0 and TNP4 as £740.
Hi Michelle Leonard, based on advice from the helpdesk, we put TNP3 as £0 (learner was PPED and we'd received all on programme payments), and TNP4 as the value of funding left to be paid to us, not...