MR
Last activity
Member since
Votes
0
Subscriptions
51
Replies
MR commented,
Thanks Paul, that's how I worked it out although, I initially thought it would be based on the contract year that is affected (contract year the learner is due to achieve) to align with the achievement rates. I was maybe over thinking it as this way kind of makes sense. So, the percentage could decrease as additional starts are processed via the ILR?
Thanks Paul, that's how I worked it out although, I initially thought it would be based on the contract year that is affected (contract year the learner is due to achieve) to align with the achieve...
MR commented,
Thanks Martin, the learner is a withdrawel with an actual last point of learning prior to the expected end funding date. I have checked all dates via the ILR and can not see any discrepancies, this is flagging as an error on the ILR
Thanks Martin, the learner is a withdrawel with an actual last point of learning prior to the expected end funding date. I have checked all dates via the ILR and can not see any discrepancies, this...
MR commented,
Hi Could you tell me why learners awaiting EPA results are not reflecting in overall achievement rates please as this is out of our control?
Hi Could you tell me why learners awaiting EPA results are not reflecting in overall achievement rates please as this is out of our control?
MR commented,
Hi Could you tell me where the statement is within the funding rules confirming that the calculation for OTJH for a full time worker is capped at 30 hours please TIA
Hi Could you tell me where the statement is within the funding rules confirming that the calculation for OTJH for a full time worker is capped at 30 hours please TIA
MR commented,
Thanks Ruth, that is what I thought re the standards, thanks for the info :) much appreciated
Thanks Ruth, that is what I thought re the standards, thanks for the info :) much appreciated