Jane Bloch
Last activity
Member since
Votes
0
Subscriptions
4
Replies
Jane Bloch commented,
Hi - it has now magically appeared. It says "From the 01/08/2022 a new employment status monitoring code (OET 3) has been introduced and should be used in the ILR to record where a change of employer has occurred, where both the previous and new Employer Identifiers are 999999999, because neither the previous nor the new employers have employer numbers on the Employer Data Service."
Hi - it has now magically appeared. It says "From the 01/08/2022 a new employment status monitoring code (OET 3) has been introduced and should be used in the ILR to record where a change of emplo...
Jane Bloch commented,
Hi Ruth Could you please email these to me too - lals.mis@leics.gov.uk? We have a few set up but this sounds really useful! Thanks so much
Hi Ruth Could you please email these to me too - lals.mis@leics.gov.uk? We have a few set up but this sounds really useful! Thanks so much
Jane Bloch commented,
We were confused by this too. One of our awarding bodies has questioned it with the ESFA and apparently they have just come back to say that "we should also be looking in the category tab, which will reflect the code for ‘Local Flexibility’ being affected". “………The way to identify this is by looking at adult skills validity and the category codes. When looking at the category codes you will see that the qualification is only available in the local flexibility offer to 31 July 2022. For devolved AEB MCA/GLA make the decision on what to deliver as part of AEB this is why the category codes for MCA/GLA have not been shut down”.
We were confused by this too. One of our awarding bodies has questioned it with the ESFA and apparently they have just come back to say that "we should also be looking in the category tab, which w...
Jane Bloch commented,
Hi - I came here first as I needed an answer before the R04 (I didn't adjust the proportion of funding for the learners concerned) but just thought I'd share the response I've now received from the ESFA helpdesk which has now thrown me into confusion again - saying I will need to change the proportion of funding field (although I guess I can argue that the learner needs all the learning again) "Please see following response from the AEB policy team: As the learner did not achieve the learning aim last year, they are able to retake it. However, as set out in paragraph 69.1 of the AEB funding rules, you will need to “reduce the funding amount claimed for the qualification aim by the percentage of learning the learner does not need”. You should use the ‘funding adjustment for prior learning’ field to show the proportion of learning still to be delivered, and this calculation is at your discretion. However, you must retain evidence of the calculation for audit. If you amend this field, you will still receive the achievement payment if the learner achieves the learning aim."
Hi - I came here first as I needed an answer before the R04 (I didn't adjust the proportion of funding for the learners concerned) but just thought I'd share the response I've now received from the...
Jane Bloch commented,
Thanks both - that's what I was hoping but then had a crisis of confidence and thought I'd better check!!
Thanks both - that's what I was hoping but then had a crisis of confidence and thought I'd better check!!