Lorraine White
Last activity
Member since
Votes
2
Subscriptions
3
Replies
Lorraine White commented,
Hi Helen, Yes, i completely agree this could be so handy - good luck with everything :)
Hi Helen, Yes, i completely agree this could be so handy - good luck with everything :)
Lorraine White commented,
Hi guys, we have a similar issue to this but more on the TNP side of things. If a learner is in gateway when changing employer then surely there are no actual training costs left, but how do we ensure we gain the full completion payment and reflect this in the ILR as the EPA cost is less than 20%?
Hi guys, we have a similar issue to this but more on the TNP side of things. If a learner is in gateway when changing employer then surely there are no actual training costs left, but how do we en...
Lorraine White commented,
Hi Helen, So actually, I wasn't aware of this. I am going by the rules but it states after 12 weeks without an employer they have to be withdrawn. I have had this before where we have withdrawn the learner and then done a new enrollment with a new DAS cohort with the new employer tying the 2 aim's together in our ILR as a formal restart of the original program. Very interesting - I'm assuming they mean that after 12 weeks, if the learner is WDing, we don't need a new cohort, we can still us the change of employer function with the new dates and TNP's in the ILR and it won't create a Dlock. That would be really handy in some cases where the setting has used up all of their funding reservations - not so much now as they have unlimited spaces but if that ever changes back this is great!
Hi Helen, So actually, I wasn't aware of this. I am going by the rules but it states after 12 weeks without an employer they have to be withdrawn. I have had this before where we have withdrawn the...
Lorraine White commented,
Helen Bryant This is a really good question - I lead our change of employer department and have had a couple of learner's leave their setting, but found a new setting between 8-9 weeks later - what I have been doing is after the 30 days period, putting the on a BIL and then gaining evidence at the new setting and doing the COE and RTW - so far I have been using the change of employer function in DAS when there has been the correct stop date from previous employer, and I have had no DLocks when adding the learner's new start date a month or 2 later, by having the BIL in the middle it ties up the 'missing funding dates' and then can carry on as normal without a DLock. We've just been revising the training plan and ensuring all forms are completed with new employer such as training plan, contract of services, APP agreement etc and recording the start date in the ILR with TNP 3's and 4's. Martin West is the above correct? As mentioned I haven't been getting any Dlocks
Helen Bryant This is a really good question - I lead our change of employer department and have had a couple of learner's leave their setting, but found a new setting between 8-9 weeks later - what...