Vic
Last activity
Member since
Votes
0
Subscriptions
18
Replies
Vic commented,
Hi Steve, Thanks for getting back to me. One thing we’re a bit unsure about is the potential risk around replacing planned OTJ with the Turing Scheme. From how we understand it, the training price agreed at the start is already covered through the apprenticeship funding to deliver the outcomes. So if Turing funding is then used in place of that, it could technically be seen as double funding for the same thing.
Hi Steve, Thanks for getting back to me. One thing we’re a bit unsure about is the potential risk around replacing planned OTJ with the Turing Scheme. From how we understand it, the training price ...
Vic commented,
Thank you to you both! I can understand from both perspectives, we've also had a self-employed learner come through where the both partners are earning through self-employment. The learner who is applying for the programme, their reported self-employment earnings as reports on the UC statement would be less than the earnings threshold however the UC has been worked out on the minimum income floor (amount of money a employed person in a similar situation would earn on NMW after tax and insurance) and this calculation would be higher than the threshold. In this scenario would you take the actual earnings from the UC statement instead of the Minimum income floor?
Thank you to you both! I can understand from both perspectives, we've also had a self-employed learner come through where the both partners are earning through self-employment. The learner who is a...
Vic commented,
Hi, great thanks, so the ILR would remain the same and we would have the documentation on file to show the change of circumstances and updated training plan and app agreement? Thanks,
Hi, great thanks, so the ILR would remain the same and we would have the documentation on file to show the change of circumstances and updated training plan and app agreement? Thanks,
Vic commented,
Thanks, the funding rules state that we must hold counter signed evidence of what has been seen. As the learners have self-dec'd they are claiming benefits would that be enough to fully-fund without validating the evidence? your assessment and evidence of eligibility for funding and a counter signed record of the evidence the learner has provided to support their eligibility for funding Thanks
Thanks, the funding rules state that we must hold counter signed evidence of what has been seen. As the learners have self-dec'd they are claiming benefits would that be enough to fully-fund withou...