Steve Haynes
Last activity
Member since
Votes
14
Subscriptions
18
Replies
Steve Haynes commented,
Thank you both for your replies - I appreciate your time. Phil Dawe, can I just clarify I understand your comment (apologies if I am being thick). If I understand correctly, what you are saying is if in that submission we have (for example) withdrawn a record back 2 months, in the Funding Summary report it would just take into account that learner isn't attracting funding for that month, but the Remittance Advice would also take into account two OPPs have been clawed back - am I on the right lines?! If I am right, that would explain why the Remittance Advice is less than the FSR, but it is the other way round?! Any additional support you can offer would be gratefully received. Steve
Thank you both for your replies - I appreciate your time. Phil Dawe, can I just clarify I understand your comment (apologies if I am being thick). If I understand correctly, what you are saying is...
Steve Haynes commented,
Thanks for the clarification Steve - any changes wouldn't reduce the Planned OTJ amount - just potentially add to it as we enhance the delivery and learning experience.
Thanks for the clarification Steve - any changes wouldn't reduce the Planned OTJ amount - just potentially add to it as we enhance the delivery and learning experience.
Steve Haynes commented,
We are looking to make some improvements to our programme to enhance the learning experience. Rather than just role out to new apprentices, we would like to explore offering the chance to existing learners, but that would mean an amendment to their Planned OTJ. It isn't an error, so the rules suggest you do not change what you originally recorded, but it seems prudent to document the change. Hope that makes sense.
We are looking to make some improvements to our programme to enhance the learning experience. Rather than just role out to new apprentices, we would like to explore offering the chance to existing...
Steve Haynes commented,
The above response needs to be C&P into the funding rules (keeping in the hahahaha bit!!) If it basically irrelevant, which it is based on your explanation, why on earth haven't they changed the wording?!?! So, to close the loop on this, we need to ensure the EU Principle meets the two criteria and by default the learner themselves is eligible?! If that is right, thank you so much for helping me to clarify!! :)
The above response needs to be C&P into the funding rules (keeping in the hahahaha bit!!) If it basically irrelevant, which it is based on your explanation, why on earth haven't they changed the wo...