r012943
Last activity
Member since
Votes
2
Subscriptions
30
Replies
r012943 commented,
Hi All, Just a query on this one - if we put date applies to as 10th (even though they left on 20th of prior month), wouldn't this mean that that the funding would come from first employer's DAS account for the month they left? And is this right if they weren't employed there on final day of the month? Unless the first employer stops the record on DAS before month end with the actual leave date and then I don't think the provider would be funded at all for that month? Which I'm guessing is probably right, and then remaining funding will be spread between start date of second ACT and planned end date? Thank you
Hi All, Just a query on this one - if we put date applies to as 10th (even though they left on 20th of prior month), wouldn't this mean that that the funding would come from first employer's DAS ac...
r012943 commented,
Hello, Is anyone able to help with this please? Thanks very much
Hello, Is anyone able to help with this please?Thanks very much
r012943 commented,
Hi Ruth, Yes, that is exactly the case - I'll have a look at the learner in the period end report as you say just to see what they look like in there. But I'm confident that it's all coded correctly, so I'm guessing the indicative report will show such learners incorrectly. Thanks again
Hi Ruth, Yes, that is exactly the case - I'll have a look at the learner in the period end report as you say just to see what they look like in there. But I'm confident that it's all coded correctl...
r012943 commented,
Hi Ruth, Thank you for that - I'm referring to learners returning from full withdrawal. And that's interesting as what you say is exactly what I thought. However, we returned this learner for R04 and the funding just hasn't calculated correctly at all. The original TNP was £3,000 and they were BIL at point of withdrawal in 2019/20 - therefore, £2,400 claimed. We have returned with the £600 remaining price with November restart date and have used restart indicator. However, the learner is showing "Price amount remaining (with upper limit applied) at start of this episode" as -£1,800? And is therefore showing with negative funding in the indicative earnings? I therefore had the feeling that perhaps the system is assuming the £600 price should apply for the whole programme, and is saying we've already had £2,400, and is therefore saying they need £1,800 back from us? Any further help would be brilliant. Thanks again
Hi Ruth, Thank you for that - I'm referring to learners returning from full withdrawal. And that's interesting as what you say is exactly what I thought. However, we returned this learner for R04 a...