Ben James
Last activity
Member since
Votes
214
Subscriptions
342
Replies
Ben James commented,
Not formally, no. The requirement to secure parent/guardian signatures on the Commitment Statement was removed from the funding rules in 2017/18; [image]
Not formally, no. The requirement to secure parent/guardian signatures on the Commitment Statement was removed from the funding rules in 2017/18;
Ben James commented,
Thanks Kelly Knights and Jessica De Melo! Appreciate your responses :)
Thanks Kelly Knights and Jessica De Melo! Appreciate your responses :)
Ben James commented,
Apologies for the confusion, probably didn't work it clearly enough! Ours still have access to the system as well and had raised the question with their apprenticeship officer because they were mindful of the funding rules regarding OTJ "work" during a break (who knew apprentices actually read the funding rules!?). But yes, they won't be doing any additional training, just administration by way of mapping what they had already done prior to starting their breaks. Thanks for clarifying!
Apologies for the confusion, probably didn't work it clearly enough! Ours still have access to the system as well and had raised the question with their apprenticeship officer because they were min...
Ben James commented,
Thanks Ruth. I was in two minds because whilst they’re not actually doing any learning and only logging OTJ training they’d done while they WERE on programme, I was still concerned because it’s a little bit of a grey area.
Thanks Ruth. I was in two minds because whilst they’re not actually doing any learning and only logging OTJ training they’d done while they WERE on programme, I was still concerned because it’s a l...
Ben James commented,
Martin West could you potentially link me to the update? Steve Hewitt agreed - wonder if "top level" will just be Level and Age Group which is nice, but as you said.. not incredibly useful for providers
Martin West could you potentially link me to the update? Steve Hewitt agreed - wonder if "top level" will just be Level and Age Group which is nice, but as you said.. not incredibly useful for pro...
Ben James commented,
Thanks Steve Hewitt - figured this was going to be the case. Doesn't make self-assessment particularly easy as a data manager, especially with no national comparator, but I guess everyone is in the same boat.
Thanks Steve Hewitt - figured this was going to be the case. Doesn't make self-assessment particularly easy as a data manager, especially with no national comparator, but I guess everyone is in the...
Ben James commented,
@Steveh.. are we in danger of delving back into the 'achievement date' naming convention debacle again? Haha
@Steveh.. are we in danger of delving back into the 'achievement date' naming convention debacle again? Haha
Ben James commented,
Thank you all, as always immensely helpful even if it's just as a sounding board!
Thank you all, as always immensely helpful even if it's just as a sounding board!
Ben James commented,
Sorry @Martin West - are you saying the first payment will be larger to account for the months missed between Aug-Dec? Or all payments will be slightly larger because it'll recalculate the duration to effectively be Dec-PED?
Sorry @Martin West - are you saying the first payment will be larger to account for the months missed between Aug-Dec? Or all payments will be slightly larger because it'll recalculate the duration...
Ben James commented,
Appreciate the nigh certainty Steve! This was my assumption too but wanted to gauge the opinions of others before reiterating to colleagues.
Appreciate the nigh certainty Steve! This was my assumption too but wanted to gauge the opinions of others before reiterating to colleagues.