Ben James

Last activity

Member since

Votes

214

Subscriptions

342

Replies

Community Reply

Ben James commented,

Not formally, no. The requirement to secure parent/guardian signatures on the Commitment Statement was removed from the funding rules in 2017/18; [image]

Not formally, no. The requirement to secure parent/guardian signatures on the Commitment Statement was removed from the funding rules in 2017/18;

Community Reply

Ben James commented,

Thanks Kelly Knights and Jessica De Melo! Appreciate your responses :)

Thanks Kelly Knights and Jessica De Melo! Appreciate your responses :)

Community Reply

Ben James commented,

Thanks Ruth. I was in two minds because whilst they’re not actually doing any learning and only logging OTJ training they’d done while they WERE on programme, I was still concerned because it’s a little bit of a grey area.

Thanks Ruth. I was in two minds because whilst they’re not actually doing any learning and only logging OTJ training they’d done while they WERE on programme, I was still concerned because it’s a l...

Community Reply

Ben James commented,

Martin West could you potentially link me to the update?  Steve Hewitt agreed - wonder if "top level" will just be Level and Age Group which is nice, but as you said.. not incredibly useful for providers

Martin West could you potentially link me to the update?  Steve Hewitt agreed - wonder if "top level" will just be Level and Age Group which is nice, but as you said.. not incredibly useful for pro...

Community Reply

Ben James commented,

Thanks Steve Hewitt - figured this was going to be the case. Doesn't make self-assessment particularly easy as a data manager, especially with no national comparator, but I guess everyone is in the same boat. 

Thanks Steve Hewitt - figured this was going to be the case. Doesn't make self-assessment particularly easy as a data manager, especially with no national comparator, but I guess everyone is in the...

Community Reply

Ben James commented,

@Steveh.. are we in danger of delving back into the 'achievement date' naming convention debacle again? Haha

@Steveh.. are we in danger of delving back into the 'achievement date' naming convention debacle again? Haha

Community Reply

Ben James commented,

Thank you all, as always immensely helpful even if it's just as a sounding board! 

Thank you all, as always immensely helpful even if it's just as a sounding board! 

Community Reply

Ben James commented,

Sorry @Martin West - are you saying the first payment will be larger to account for the months missed between Aug-Dec? Or all payments will be slightly larger because it'll recalculate the duration to effectively be Dec-PED?

Sorry @Martin West - are you saying the first payment will be larger to account for the months missed between Aug-Dec? Or all payments will be slightly larger because it'll recalculate the duration...

Community Reply

Ben James commented,

Appreciate the nigh certainty Steve! This was my assumption too but wanted to gauge the opinions of others before reiterating to colleagues. 

Appreciate the nigh certainty Steve! This was my assumption too but wanted to gauge the opinions of others before reiterating to colleagues.