Tracey Grant
Last activity
Member since
Votes
1
Subscriptions
40
Replies
Tracey Grant commented,
This was definitely coded as a restart - and the funding was the residual balance...and still no reply from DFE!
This was definitely coded as a restart - and the funding was the residual balance...and still no reply from DFE!
Tracey Grant commented,
Hi Alice, No i've not not seen this - and I must admit I did wonder if it should be TNP3/4 - I'll certainly watch this! Many thanks Tracey
Hi Alice, No i've not not seen this - and I must admit I did wonder if it should be TNP3/4 - I'll certainly watch this! Many thanks Tracey
Tracey Grant commented,
Hi Ruth Thanks for your reply - which confirms exactly what I have done - yet we have not being paid correctly ie we have not received any new monthly payments since restarting and now they have completed we are only being paid the difference between the residual price and what was previously paid under the first period of learning - in essence the restart is being treated as just a renegotiated price...suggesting that the TNP codes for the restart should have been recorded as TNP3/4?! I am currently awaiting a reply from the helpdesk on this one....so wish me luck! Tracey
Hi Ruth Thanks for your reply - which confirms exactly what I have done - yet we have not being paid correctly ie we have not received any new monthly payments since restarting and now they have c...
Tracey Grant commented,
Hi Ruth We've treated them as a new start from 9/10/25 and assumed that as they were on less than 33 days previously (PLR confirms only this one episode in 2023) that it would not count against us. It does seem very harsh that on one the one hand they are counted as DNS...but the next Provider is the one to lose out!
Hi Ruth We've treated them as a new start from 9/10/25 and assumed that as they were on less than 33 days previously (PLR confirms only this one episode in 2023) that it would not count against us....
Tracey Grant commented,
Hi Steve, I agree that's what appears to have been done - but if a learner is a Did not Start then this should cancel the start surely.......otherwise yet again we are being penalised
Hi Steve, I agree that's what appears to have been done - but if a learner is a Did not Start then this should cancel the start surely.......otherwise yet again we are being penalised
Tracey Grant commented,
Hi Ruth thanks for your reply - and yes I agree with you it doesn't make sense - happy to discuss off-line if you have 5 minutes - my email is tracey@brighterhorizonstraining.co.uk thanks Tracey
Hi Ruth thanks for your reply - and yes I agree with you it doesn't make sense - happy to discuss off-line if you have 5 minutes - my email is tracey@brighterhorizonstraining.co.uk thanks Tracey
Tracey Grant commented,
Thank for your reply Ruth and I agree it's not clear here...and we are yet again at risk here of being penalised for normal employer practice. It isn't unreasonable for an employer to want new staff to pass probation before they invest either LEVY or co-investment funding into training. If the new employer is willing to sanction BIL, as passing probation is a pre-requisite for resuming the apprenticeship, arguably we could transfer to new employer / then put on a BIL for that reason?
Thank for your reply Ruth and I agree it's not clear here...and we are yet again at risk here of being penalised for normal employer practice. It isn't unreasonable for an employer to want new staf...