Sue Bishop
Last activity
Member since
Votes
4
Subscriptions
22
Replies
Sue Bishop commented,
Sue Bishop commented,
The functional skills 'deliverer' would be considered a subcontractor and you would then need to adhere to the subcontracting rules. Sue
The functional skills 'deliverer' would be considered a subcontractor and you would then need to adhere to the subcontracting rules. Sue
Sue Bishop commented,
For the transfers that I have taken recently via ESFA the answer is no you can't. Sue
For the transfers that I have taken recently via ESFA the answer is no you can't. Sue
Sue Bishop commented,
I can't say I've seen a rule in the guidance that says the learner can't enter Gateway, but if you think of it logically, the employer gets the completion certificate so where is the incentive to pay you once that has happened?
I can't say I've seen a rule in the guidance that says the learner can't enter Gateway, but if you think of it logically, the employer gets the completion certificate so where is the incentive to p...
Sue Bishop commented,
Won't you have to invoice the non-levy employer for 5% of the outstanding amount, ie 5% of the TNP2 if you've had all the OPPs?
Won't you have to invoice the non-levy employer for 5% of the outstanding amount, ie 5% of the TNP2 if you've had all the OPPs?
Sue Bishop commented,
What success have you had with completing a skill scan using the KSB of the L2 in a tripartite manner, including the employer. Possibly recommend the L3 rather than the L2?
What success have you had with completing a skill scan using the KSB of the L2 in a tripartite manner, including the employer. Possibly recommend the L3 rather than the L2?
Sue Bishop commented,
Of course if they have been paying them cash in hand with no contract, that is another issue......... I've got to say I really dislike this manipulation, but I'm sure it does happen.
Of course if they have been paying them cash in hand with no contract, that is another issue......... I've got to say I really dislike this manipulation, but I'm sure it does happen.
Sue Bishop commented,
No they can't claim the incentive as the guidance states they cannot have been employed by the employer during the previous six months. Will be checked through NI number.
No they can't claim the incentive as the guidance states they cannot have been employed by the employer during the previous six months. Will be checked through NI number.
Sue Bishop commented,
Hi Caroline I haven't seen anything for 20/21 in terms of guidance for PDSAT reports, however here's my take on the reports you mention, bearing in mind that PDSAT is a sense checker, rather than an error checker, a kind of 'you said this, is that what you mean' 21A-216 - Planned hours. The key columns here are the planned OTJ hours and actual OTJ hours. I do a quick scan down to ensure that the actual are no less than the planned (typos are easy to do). I'm guessing that this report (which is a new one) is one the auditors will look at and sample to ensure the OTJ hrs you say have been completed have actually been completed. 21B-006 - Learners enrolled concurrently on multiple English and/or maths learning aims - I have half a dozen learners on this report and they are learners who withdrew from the legacy FS and enrolled on reform. Because of their prior learning, I have detailed on the ILR the amount of learning left to claim, ensuring that there is no issue, as the two qualifications are the same level and the same £ value. Does that make sense? Sue
Hi Caroline I haven't seen anything for 20/21 in terms of guidance for PDSAT reports, however here's my take on the reports you mention, bearing in mind that PDSAT is a sense checker, rather than a...
Sue Bishop commented,
Hi Sarah The PDSAT reports aren't an error checker, more of a sense checker. Try to think of it in terms of 'you said this, is that correct' (I'm sure someone else will have a much better phrase for this!) Sue
Hi Sarah The PDSAT reports aren't an error checker, more of a sense checker. Try to think of it in terms of 'you said this, is that correct' (I'm sure someone else will have a much better phrase f...