Phil Dawe
Last activity
Member since
Votes
81
Subscriptions
37
Replies
Phil Dawe commented,
A 'Non-starter' would be someone with no instances of learning and would not be returned in the ILR. 'Qualifying enrolments' are those who's actual duration - difference in number of days between their first recorded instance of learning and their last - is greater than the defined qualifying period which is based on their planned duration - difference in days between their first day of learning and their planned end date. 'Qualifying enrolments' count for funding and QAR purposes i.e would generate OPP and Job outcome payments where applicable. The qualifying period for AEB enrolments is dependant on the planned duration of the course: Adult education budget: funding and performance management rules 2023 to 2024 - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) Duration s can be found in the Funding rates and Formula doc linked from the guidance above or here: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1186272/Funding_rates_and_formula_2023_to_2024_v2.0__002_.pdf In summary for 23/24: Planned length of the learning aim 168 days or more; Qualifying period - 42 days Planned length of the learning aim 14 to 167 days; Qualifying period - 14 days Planned length of the learning aim Fewer than 14 days; Qualifying period - 1 day Note for 16-18 study programme qualifying periods the first and last date of learning/attendance are considered at the programme level and not individual aims. HTH, Phil
A 'Non-starter' would be someone with no instances of learning and would not be returned in the ILR. 'Qualifying enrolments' are those who's actual duration - difference in number of days between t...
Phil Dawe commented,
Provider Support Manual: 2023 to 2024 - GCSE maths and English condition of funding (submit-learner-data.service.gov.uk) HTH Phil
Provider Support Manual: 2023 to 2024 - GCSE maths and English condition of funding (submit-learner-data.service.gov.uk) HTH Phil
Phil Dawe commented,
Agree with Steve Hewitt. However, you do need to be careful of the £4400 per learner funding cap though. Depending on the unweighted rate of the hair dressing course you MAY receive less than you thought that you would for the learner. From memory the ESFA will prioritise this funding to the first enrolling provider. HTH Phil
Agree with Steve Hewitt. However, you do need to be careful of the £4400 per learner funding cap though. Depending on the unweighted rate of the hair dressing course you MAY receive less than you t...
Phil Dawe commented,
Pretty strict. If you change the date you will come a cropper where the Agency are trying to match aims across years. HTH Phil
Pretty strict. If you change the date you will come a cropper where the Agency are trying to match aims across years. HTH Phil
Phil Dawe commented,
Ah Timely. The ESFA have pretty much phased it out. - It is not available for E&T on view your education data and is being phased out for Apps in favour of the Apprenticeship accountability frame work. In answer to your question though you need to include all achievers who achieve up to 90 days after their PED in the numerator and all qualified starts - those that pass their qual. period (may be less than 42 days it depends on the aim duration!) - who have a PED in the current reporting year in the denominator. -- Or -- Achieves with an achievement date < PED + 90 days / All starts that have passed their Qual date with a PED in the reporting year From Business Rules for Qualification Achievement Rates from 2017 to 2018 (publishing.service.gov.uk): 13 The timely QAR calculation measures the number of aims achieved on or before their planned end date, or no more than 90 days after it, as a percentage of the number of aims planned to complete in the reporting year. We do not count achieved aims with an actual end date more than 90 days after the planned end date as achievements in the timely method. HTH, Phil
Ah Timely. The ESFA have pretty much phased it out. - It is not available for E&T on view your education data and is being phased out for Apps in favour of the Apprenticeship accountability frame w...
Phil Dawe commented,
Steve Hewitt, totally agree for learners who have Refugee status as printed on their BRP. In my experience this is not always the case with individuals who are refereed to as 'Refugees' 🤔.
Steve Hewitt, totally agree for learners who have Refugee status as printed on their BRP. In my experience this is not always the case with individuals who are refereed to as 'Refugees' 🤔.
Phil Dawe commented,
You should not be returning any aim - non-accredited or otherwise that is not actual teaching and learning especially across academic years. IMO you don't need to 'get around' returning a destination record; as they have completed their programme for 22/23 a destination record is expected. You can return destination records up until R14 in October for 22/23. When you re-enrol them in Sept. you can add a destination record for 22/23 (with code EDU4). If they don't return you can contact them to find out where they have ended up and return a the relevant code for their actual destination. HTH Phil
You should not be returning any aim - non-accredited or otherwise that is not actual teaching and learning especially across academic years.IMO you don't need to 'get around' returning a destinatio...
Phil Dawe commented,
What does his BRP card say is his current immigration status and are there restrictions to working on it? If he doesn't have a BRP is he an asylum seeker?
What does his BRP card say is his current immigration status and are there restrictions to working on it? If he doesn't have a BRP is he an asylum seeker?
Phil Dawe commented,
No, they would be a qualifying start for both funding and QAR. Assuming the aim planned duration is 168 days or more; they qualify on the 42nd day. HTH Phil
No, they would be a qualifying start for both funding and QAR. Assuming the aim planned duration is 168 days or more; they qualify on the 42nd day. HTH Phil
Phil Dawe commented,
Hi Maria, I have seen this with BKSB for a number of years. IMO, the initial assessments are a good indicator for 90% of learners but there is variance when the learners complete the diagnostic assessment as it covers a broader scope. Assuming that the learner has completed the Diagnostic assessment within their funding/Performance qualifying period I would change the learning aim/enrolment (as per the provider support manual https://guidance.submit-learner-data.service.gov.uk/ ) to that which is indicated by the diagnostic assessment and re-issue paper work. Make sure to keep records of the Diagnostic assessment as well as the Inital assessment to demonstrate how you have determined the learner's starting level should you be audited. HTH, Phil
Hi Maria, I have seen this with BKSB for a number of years. IMO, the initial assessments are a good indicator for 90% of learners but there is variance when the learners complete the diagnostic ass...