chloe.royce
Last activity
Member since
Votes
2
Subscriptions
5
Replies
chloe.royce commented,
We had a few last year that informed us after the 60 days and we had no issues claiming, just obtained the appropriate evidence etc and recorded in ILR.
We had a few last year that informed us after the 60 days and we had no issues claiming, just obtained the appropriate evidence etc and recorded in ILR.
chloe.royce commented,
Think it has to be a DAS stop and create a new record. Or see if the LRS can merge the previous ULN to the new one so that you can continue to use.
Think it has to be a DAS stop and create a new record. Or see if the LRS can merge the previous ULN to the new one so that you can continue to use.
chloe.royce commented,
I'm not sure it will be updated - I think the minimum remains the same until there is a review of annex c which I think I read will only be updated at certain points in time?
I'm not sure it will be updated - I think the minimum remains the same until there is a review of annex c which I think I read will only be updated at certain points in time?
chloe.royce commented,
The published minimum is for an apprentice with no RPL. If a learner has RPL, you deduct this from the published minimum and that gives you the new minimum requirement. E.g published minimum is 400 hours, you identify RPL of 30 hours, new minimum is 370 (400-30).
The published minimum is for an apprentice with no RPL. If a learner has RPL, you deduct this from the published minimum and that gives you the new minimum requirement. E.g published minimum is 400...
chloe.royce commented,
Use the original planned end date to calculate the minimum OTJ. If they have met the minimum for the time they were originally planned to be on programme then they will be ok.
Use the original planned end date to calculate the minimum OTJ. If they have met the minimum for the time they were originally planned to be on programme then they will be ok.
chloe.royce commented,
I would just leave this coded as 1.8 as they're in gateway with no learning to take a break from
I would just leave this coded as 1.8 as they're in gateway with no learning to take a break from
chloe.royce commented,
Yes, they would need a new agreement to cover the entire period on programme.
Yes, they would need a new agreement to cover the entire period on programme.
chloe.royce commented,
You could still extend the planned end, there just wouldn't be any more funding
You could still extend the planned end, there just wouldn't be any more funding
chloe.royce commented,
We use the date that they sit their final element of EPA as the achievement date
We use the date that they sit their final element of EPA as the achievement date
chloe.royce commented,
It is the later of the 2 dates. So if the planned end is 24/25, even if you withdrew them in 23/24, they count as leavers in 24/25. It works the other way too, if the planned end is 23/24 but you withdrawn in 24/25 they count as leavers in 24/25.
It is the later of the 2 dates. So if the planned end is 24/25, even if you withdrew them in 23/24, they count as leavers in 24/25. It works the other way too, if the planned end is 23/24 but you w...