Chloe
Last activity
Member since
Votes
2
Subscriptions
3
Replies
Chloe commented,
Think it has to be a DAS stop and create a new record. Or see if the LRS can merge the previous ULN to the new one so that you can continue to use.
Think it has to be a DAS stop and create a new record. Or see if the LRS can merge the previous ULN to the new one so that you can continue to use.
Chloe commented,
I'm not sure it will be updated - I think the minimum remains the same until there is a review of annex c which I think I read will only be updated at certain points in time?
I'm not sure it will be updated - I think the minimum remains the same until there is a review of annex c which I think I read will only be updated at certain points in time?
Chloe commented,
The published minimum is for an apprentice with no RPL. If a learner has RPL, you deduct this from the published minimum and that gives you the new minimum requirement. E.g published minimum is 400 hours, you identify RPL of 30 hours, new minimum is 370 (400-30).
The published minimum is for an apprentice with no RPL. If a learner has RPL, you deduct this from the published minimum and that gives you the new minimum requirement. E.g published minimum is 400...
Chloe commented,
Use the original planned end date to calculate the minimum OTJ. If they have met the minimum for the time they were originally planned to be on programme then they will be ok.
Use the original planned end date to calculate the minimum OTJ. If they have met the minimum for the time they were originally planned to be on programme then they will be ok.
Chloe commented,
I would just leave this coded as 1.8 as they're in gateway with no learning to take a break from
I would just leave this coded as 1.8 as they're in gateway with no learning to take a break from
Chloe commented,
Yes, they would need a new agreement to cover the entire period on programme.
Yes, they would need a new agreement to cover the entire period on programme.
Chloe commented,
You could still extend the planned end, there just wouldn't be any more funding
You could still extend the planned end, there just wouldn't be any more funding
Chloe commented,
We use the date that they sit their final element of EPA as the achievement date
We use the date that they sit their final element of EPA as the achievement date
Chloe commented,
It is the later of the 2 dates. So if the planned end is 24/25, even if you withdrew them in 23/24, they count as leavers in 24/25. It works the other way too, if the planned end is 23/24 but you withdrawn in 24/25 they count as leavers in 24/25.
It is the later of the 2 dates. So if the planned end is 24/25, even if you withdrew them in 23/24, they count as leavers in 24/25. It works the other way too, if the planned end is 23/24 but you w...
Chloe commented,
You can enrol as a restart with restart indicator, you then add both periods of learning together to meet the minimum duration.
You can enrol as a restart with restart indicator, you then add both periods of learning together to meet the minimum duration.